Failure to Provide Adequate Privilege Log, Waives Privilege

Supreme Court of Virginia

A circuit court ordered Montgomery Regional Hospital, Inc. to produce peer review reports and other similar documents due to its untimely and inadequate privilege log.  In Creasy, Admr. v. Medical Assocs. of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Case No.: CL17-1582, the decedent's estate brought a wrongful death action against the hospital and various providers involved in the decedent's care.  Decedent died from complications following a cardiac catheterization. After decedent's death, the hospital performed a "root cause analysis" or RCA.

In Requests for Production, Plaintiff requested the RCA documents related to the decedent's death.  Counsel for the hospital relied on Virginia Code §§ 8.01-581.16 and 8.01-581.17, as well as the federal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005, to assert the peer review privilege and withheld the documents from Plaintiff. In discovery responses, defense counsel provided a privilege log which stated the subject documents were privileged because they were "prepared for purposes of improvement of patient safety and quality of care."  In addition to the root cause analysis, defense counsel also stated that a hospital peer review report, prepared by an interventional cardiologist who reviewed the case, and handwritten notes were also privileged. This discovery dispute went on for several months.  At the hearing, defense counsel admitted that she had not seen the RCA.

Judge Long ordered the documents to be produced to Plaintiff within two days of the hearing. In his holding, Judge Long ruled that the hospital waived the privilege protections of Virginia Code §§ 8.01-581.16 and 581.17 and the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 because of its inadequate privilege log. In addition to defense counsel failing to review the subject documents before asserting the privilege, the Court held that the hospital failed to provide any support to its claim of privilege, as well as failing to timely and properly respond to discovery requests.

When dealing with privileged documents, it is crucial that counsel not only verify the documents in question are privileged, but also adequately describe the documents and state the reason(s) why the documents are privileged in a privilege log. As always, this should be done in a timely manner in accordance with the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia.

Subscribe for Updates

Subscribe to receive useful articles, legal updates and firm news to keep you informed and up-to-date on important issues and trends.

Sign Up

Media Contact

Rachel Lufkin
804.783.6799

Email Rachel 

Jump to Page

Sands Anderson Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek